State Seeks to Defend Its Approved Air Quality Program in Nation's Highest Court August 14, 2002
"At stake in this suit is Alaska's ability to use common sense permitting to protect the quality of our air," said Knowles, who consulted with Attorney General Bruce Botelho in deciding whether to appeal the court decision. "We want to issue permits based on cost-effective and actual environmental results, not on the latest pet technology that's unproven in Arctic conditions and unnecessarily expensive." According to the news release, in 1998, mine operator Teck Cominco, Inc. requested a new air quality permit to install a seventh diesel generator at the mine for additional and backup power. The Department of Environmental Conservation, the state agency that issues air quality permits under the Clean Air Act, invested considerable time and research developing an air quality permit which allows for more power generation at the mine without causing a significant increase in emissions. Eventually, the state required that emission controls be installed on the mine's new diesel
But the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) objected, filing an order to block the permit and threatening fines if Teck Cominco powered up the new generator. EPA mandated that a new technology - selective catalytic reduction - be used on the new generator. This new technology is unproven in Arctic conditions. And under EPA's plan, the six older generators would be allowed to emit more than under the state permit. "The state's permit achieves less nitrogen oxide emissions from the facility overall than EPA's mandated plan," said Knowles, who was joined in his announcement by Michele Brown, Commissioner of the Dept. of Environmental Conservation. "Amazingly, the result of the EPA's action is more emissions, not less, and at a greater cost." The EPA's technology will cost up to $1.5 million more a year in operating costs and up to $10 million more in construction costs than the state's solution. The state originally sued the federal EPA over this issue in 2000, after a series of meetings with EPA and Teck Cominco failed to resolve the issue. On July 30, 2002, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal ruled that EPA had acted correctly in requiring Teck Cominco to install the new technology. "It's unfortunate we are forced to take these steps," said Knowles. "For two years, we've been trying to negotiate a resolution with the EPA that recognizes common sense and Alaska's unique conditions and protects Alaskan jobs." The generator, which has already been shipped to Red Dog, remains idle.
Source of News Release:
|